Відео

OUTSIDE THE UNIVERSE IS COMPLIT DARKNESS.

You nailed it at the 27minute mark m8 when you said :You might think I'm Crazy???" - You can bet on it fella- I think you're Crazy.

A good lecturer but at times I kept getting annoyed at his comments that I found somewhat condescending, or even rude; it’s like at times he thought he was addressing children. The comment about white males was silly and unnecessary, he could simply have referred to them as scientists but instead he took the direction of invoking race and sex.

Dr. Beacham, I'm here for a scientific, objective physics lecture, not a subjective sociopolitical one. (42:28 and in spots beyond.) We should keep those things out of the "hard science" classroom. I'm sure that you, and hopefully every physicist worth his salt would object if I tried to use the physics classroom to advance say, a particular set of religious beliefs, whatever they might be. Likewise, I object to the promotion of any subjective, emotionally-driven sociopolitical agenda, ANY one, noble or not, in a hard science class. I would have expected better from someone of your credentials. SMH😞

His friend asked, "What's at the edge of the universe?" Well, Antarctica, silly! 😜 And underneath, it's turtles all the way down! (BTW, to the learned out there,... "Are you a Turtle?") 🐢 😄

Dear Mr. Beacham Gravity is just kinetic energy. vacuums don't have density. densless states of matter makes density move. Are vacuums states of matter what is the scale. vacuums are timeless and "(Massless?)" while electons are timless but they have density. vacuums then plasma then gas then liquid and solid to nuclear. but states of matter are more complex then that. we have platonic states of matter where extra protons are picked up. What is mass then is density and density is inertial energy. Gravity is kenitic energy because we are surrounded with gas which acts like plasma which acts like vacuums. the important part about mass is that the closer you are to the center of gravity the denser you are. What is a vacuum? What i mean by massless; is that any mass right there is being expanded faster than the speed of light. X-mass Y-velocity Z-mass S-speed Basically speed cancels each other out because everytime you speed velocity up it looks like you gained mass on object (a) because object (b) was inside with this graph. Which sounds familiar to me. Heres an example. \:The "Marry Go Round (MGR) experiment" You Johny, and Danny are playing on MGR A and B. Johny is standing on MGR A and danny is standing on MGR B. MGR B is sitting atop MGR A. Both MGRs get spun in the same direction. This experiment is decribe the difference between expansion and speed. You are the origin for Johny' speed and Johny is the origin for Danny's speed. What does Johny have speed in reference to~ you? Yes you are completely relative to his position. Thus Johny is relative to Danny's position not you; because you have no force enacting on Danny. Why does Danny move faster than Johny when the same amount of force is enacting upon them? I'll tell you why It's because Danny is expanding away. You see Danny has his own limit of speed; Johny can spin Danny as fast as light moves because Johny is Danny's origin. :\Plasma is timeless but vacuums the first state of matter are densless. Speed becomes fourth dimensional in a vacuum. Solids can store this extra dimension of speed really well because they hold shape. This is called inertial force. :\Expansion can easily be engineered in the same way the marry go round experiment does it. Lets say you create an electrical magnetic force inside a coil spun in the shape of a solo cup. the electrical magnetic charge is connected to a casing with coils of the same device in multiple sequences until you reach the expedition ship. Now of course you would have to allow the coil to be hot for anything to happen but you begin to expand at a rate greater than the speed of light and possibly even faster. Whats the problem; we have a limitation of devices. This is as far as i can take us into the future thank you. Sincerely- Ronald Braden Russell, __ or Mr. only has a highschool degree? ps device 2 laser computer __________________________ system one: I~ cast; II~ inner ring cylinder/gear(?) axel; III~ middle cylinder, IV~ brush anode connection, V~ axel. the cast doesn't move but (II) is a sum thick cylinder that moves on ball bearing means of a belt or gear system, (III) moves on the center axel and the (v) the center axel has some anode which collects information and sends it to (IV) who takes the computation numbers into the rest of the system. \:The inner ring has mounted lasers ~ and the middle cylinder has a glass waved medium with electricity flowing through. (II) and (IV) move independantely in oppisite directions to express a form of mass expansion replicating the movement of a black hole.

This was going well till the Obama “kids in cages” bs. these radicalized scientists are getting to be tiresome. Besides he didn’t say anything that I hadn’t heard before. He read all the same journals I have, and I’m realizing he’s just regurgitating other peoples ideas. Which includes the “kids in cages“. What happened to our scientist being innovators, not echo chambers. Science celebrity has ruined the discipline.

I really don’t understand the purpose of saying the guys who won the Nobel prize were two white males. Should the Nobel been given to somebody else who isn’t a white male for their discovery? They discovered it, so they get the prize. I’m liberal and progressive, but that’s unnecessary. Other than that, I’m enjoying the lecture.

In Thailand our ATM put remove your card at the end of the process too. Some machine put beeping sound at the end to remind us to remove the card.

My particles cyber bully me

So uh what if the big cold spot is where another universe DID collide and that is what caused the Universe to begin accelerating again and the scenario he talked about is actually in the process of happening? It's only 4 am. I'm fine

good job Lucia !

This was pretty amazing, my mind is blown right now - I'm really surprised there is only 1 other comment here? I would love to explore this in depth and learn a lot more about the points Renata discusses.

Loved it

In the meantime, somebody from Sweden listened to this professor and alike, and now, Sweeds, among others who followed the same stupidity, have a huge crime problem. *If you haven't heard it in the news, Google it and learn for yourself. This professor, a brilliant physics communicator, is "suffering" from the same issue every WOKE person is - suicidal empathy. Some time ago, that empathy had been weaponized against the Western world - it was kidnapped and held hostage long enough to develop the Stockholm syndrome - and here we are.

I’m 33 mins in & thinking humanity in some way has always known there are other places besides our universe, whether you call them multiverses, spiritual realms or dimensions. Christians call them Heaven & Hell.

Thank for this amazing talk ❤

Excellent presentation.

This lecture was amazing

This went from a great discussion to a political one. It kinda makes me question their motives and credibility..

It was good until all the political bullshit.

I like how he tried to get woke with the Nobel prize thing but actually came off racist

One day science will discover, and I share with you the fact I found from the most read book in this world. Beyond the universe of stars, black holes nebulas there is a void, beyond which there is another universe then another then another 7 universes on top of each. Beyond this is a void much larger and then light and more light and then creator.

My answer is no genius...scholar astronomer or scientist can't answer straightforward because they dont know what really outside the universe because they havent been there all they saying is just base on there personal perspective.

Stupid question.

My friend ask me for fried chicken and I said I don’t know

Why is the universe expanding if there is nothing beyond the edge of universe. What is it that it is expanding. From inside space is expanding. Is there something beyond the edge that is being stretched.

I think they call it the big bang theory for a reason.

So, 8 years old, riding your bike out of town at night, with your female indigenous buddy, discussing black holes, distant galaxies, and flat rock origin stories with the sky "kilometers" above... idk man, probably goes on to be a good story, but I'm not buying the set up.

Without Higg's boson particle we won't be here! Doesn't the statement sound very familiar? Don't all the religion say the same about SOMEBODY ELSE?

Good sarcasm, yet the fact of our current state of knowledge is very tragic. We are living in the era of "knowledge fettishism" and Einstein hype. All what scientists tell us has absolutely no purpose other than telling about it to somebody else, provided one finds enough fools to listen to, without questionig the purpose. "Knowledge for its own sake out of curiosity" along with very suitable, equally purpose free criterion of proof, "PREDICTIONS tallying with results of experiments and/or observations" is the bane of human race. When you don't know where you are going no road can be wrong. NEITHER CAN ANY BE RIGHT. So, manufacture more and more sophisticated weapons and kill each other while also polluting the environment. All other benefits are either leftovers or byproducts of that main purpose. Even this internet you and I communicate through just now, is a leftover from a defence project. And all Nobel prizes, including for peace, are awarded from the profits of the weapons manufacturing company started by the inventor of dynamite. It is high time we turn our attention to derive the mathematical model of the mechanism how particle interactions inside the earth develop PLANTS on its own surface, to then deliver and sustain beings here through them. This earth is the only vessel in the entire known universe that manufactures bodies in its bowels and delivers through plants as food and air for the already delivered ones of the same type to assemble. Remember, PLANTS remain the only entity in the entire known universe that delivers and sustains 100% of all life in it. This uniqueness of the earth and its PLANTS must be recognized and analyzed as such, the Copernican mediocrity assumption notwithstanding.

The universe is an infinite singularity. Everything is just thought. It’s possible that there is no possible answer.

New Fermi Paradox conjecture. Civilizations build massive super-collders like the Moon Collider setting off a reaction that consumes not only their planet in their universe but also their planet in ALL universes of the multiverse. So even if we in our own universe choose not to build such a collider, other versions of us will and destroy us all. 100% probability that all civilizations self extinguish when they reach this stage. That means our particular universe must be close to the tip of technological spear. Any day now one of our alternate selves may destroy us all!🤔😱🤣

Started well...but never answered the question at hand.

46:54. The Universe is a uterus!!

Here is my argument against infinity, and an infinite number of universes. Both would mean that an infinite number of possibilities exist. This means that there is either an infinite number of places in the universe, or an infinite number of universes where I somehow found a way to contact all other versions of myself throughout either the infinite universe, or infinite multiverses. Since I sit here not having heard a word from another me, not even a peep or a sign, then those versions of me that found a way to contact all other versions of me, simply do not exist. Since an infinite universe and an infinite number of multiverses must include those possibilities, and none of them actually do, then there is no infinite universe, or multiverses. As for what is "outside of the universe", what if there is no "outside" of the universe? What if even the big bang never happened? What if the universe has just always been here making it impossible to know its age, and the objects that we see that are "moving away from each other" are just basically a "snow globe effect"? Speaking of the big bang, in an infinite number of multiverses, there would have to be an infinite number of universes in which the big bang never happened. Since most scientists agree there was a big bang and that is how the universe came into being, then wouldn't all of the universes in the multiverse require a "big bang" too? Yes, they would, but since an infinite number of them had no big bang, that pretty much shoots down that theory in my opinion.

Excellent

The secret word is "Um".

the dry mouth sounds are grinding my gears . Other than that, thanks for the upload

That’s crazy, I didn’t know Wes Anderson was also a partial physicist

This guy is a crazy EXTREMIST leftist. Make no mistake, this guy is a fascist who needs water cause his dry mouth sounds horrible

As a kid I used to ask "How can the universe be infinite and if it's not and it stops at a brick wall somewhere what's on the other side of the wall ?"

A Large Jew !

"It would be scarier if I were out here by myself" wow, that one hit hard.

Man I love these subjects so much I wish I had the math skills to enter this field. Dr. James is amazing at these lectures just dropping gems left and right.

Do it in the moon just in case it become a blackhole.😂

You are for sure an interesting person. You probably have a very very high IQ. Because of the nature of your talk and your excitement with the topic, I’m likely sure you are an atheist. So, it’s also very likely that you do not believe in Jesus Christ. (Yes, this statement at this point, will cause most of y’all to go ballistic!!!). That’s okay. The Holy Bible in the Book of Revelation, talks about the End of Time and this stuff fits in with that time. I suggest that you folks read the Book of Matthew chapter 24 and the Book of Revelation. Revelation chapters 17 and 18, reveal characteristics of this time in history. There will be a Judgement and unbelievers will face a terrible eternity. I am hoping, that some of you can be saved.

Physics' as a political weapon, is not physics it's opinion!!!!!!!!

but building a particle collider on the moon is an awesome idea! But i have a better a better idea.

i wasted a whole lot of time watching this nonsense!!! I can give a better conference